Doorgaan naar hoofdcontent

Aanbevolen post

Abonnementen gaan vanaf 1 juli een beetje anders want mijn favoriet Feedburner gaat met pensioen

Ik ben op zoek naar een goede vervanger. Zit u dus wat geks langskomen de boel is niet gehackt!   Interessant artikel? Deel het eens met uw netwerk en help mee met het verspreiden van de bekendheid van dit blog. Er staan wellicht nog meer artikelen op dit weblog die u zullen boeien. Kijk gerust eens rond. Zelf graag wat willen plaatsen? Mail dan In verband met geldwolven die denken geld te kunnen claimen op krantenartikelen die op een blog als deze worden geplaatst maar na meestal een dag voor de krantenlezers aan leeswaardigheid hebben ingeboet terwijl wij vreemdelingenrecht specialisten ze soms wel nog jaren gebruiken om er een kopie van te maken voor een zaak ga ik over tot het plaatsen van alleen het eerste stukje. Ja ik weet het: de kans dat u doorklikt is geringer dan wanneer het hele artikel hier staat en een kopie van het orgineel maken handig kan zijn voor uw zaak. Wilt u zelf wat overnemen van dit weblog. Dat mag. Zet er alleen even een l

Europese gedwongen migratie

Zoals u wellicht weet had ik liever geschiedenis dan rechten gestudeerd maar volgens mijn geldschieter (pa) was daar weinig brood mee te verdienen.

Vandaag ontdekte ik het volgende artikel over massa migratie in Europa. Het artikel begint met te melden dat bijna niemand dit weet. Klopt. Jaren geleden stond ik in een museum in Hamelen te ontcijferen waar in hemelsnaam die nieuwe expositie nou over ging. Bleek dat veel inwoners van die stad bij Hannover orgineel uit het huidige Polen waren uitgezet.

Dus voor alle EU tegenstanders. Lees eens en wees dankbaar dat we niet meer de lopen op de buurlanden gericht hebben staan.

The European Atrocity You Never Heard About

The European Atrocity You Never Heard About 1
Hoover Institution Archives
In the largest episode of forced migration in history, millions of German-speaking civilians were sent to Germany from Czechoslovakia (above) and other European countries after World War II by order of the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union.
The screams that rang throughout the darkened cattle car crammed with deportees, as it jolted across the icy Polish countryside five nights before Christmas, were Dr. Loch's only means of locating his patient. The doctor, formerly chief medical officer of a large urban hospital, now found himself clambering over piles of baggage, fellow passengers, and buckets used as toilets, only to find his path blocked by an old woman who ignored his request to move aside. On closer examination, he discovered that she had frozen to death.
Finally he located the source of the screams, a pregnant woman who had gone into premature labor and was hemorrhaging profusely. When he attempted to move her from where she lay into a more comfortable position, he found that "she was frozen to the floor with her own blood." Other than temporarily stanching the bleeding, Loch was unable to do anything to help her, and he never learned whether she had lived or died. When the train made its first stop, after more than four days in transit, 16 frost-covered corpses were pulled from the wagons before the remaining deportees were put back on board to continue their journey. A further 42 passengers would later succumb to the effects of their ordeal, among them Loch's wife.
The European Atrocity You Never Heard About 2
Hoover Institution Archives
An estimated 500,000 people died in the course of the organized expulsions; survivors were left in Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves.
During the Second World War, tragic scenes like those were commonplace, as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin moved around entire populations like pieces on a chessboard, seeking to reshape the demographic profile of Europe according to their own preferences. What was different about the deportation of Loch and his fellow passengers, however, was that it took place by order of the United States and Britain as well as the Soviet Union, nearly two years after the declaration of peace.
Between 1945 and 1950, Europe witnessed the largest episode of forced migration, and perhaps the single greatest movement of population, in human history. Between 12 million and 14 million German-speaking civilians—the overwhelming majority of whom were women, old people, and children under 16—were forcibly ejected from their places of birth in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, and what are today the western districts of Poland. As The New York Times noted in December 1945, the number of people the Allies proposed to transfer in just a few months was about the same as the total number of all the immigrants admitted to the United States since the beginning of the 20th century. They were deposited among the ruins of Allied-occupied Germany to fend for themselves as best they could. The number who died as a result of starvation, disease, beatings, or outright execution is unknown, but conservative estimates suggest that at least 500,000 people lost their lives in the course of the operation.
Most disturbingly of all, tens of thousands perished as a result of ill treatment while being used as slave labor (or, in the Allies' cynical formulation, "reparations in kind") in a vast network of camps extending across central and southeastern Europe—many of which, like Auschwitz I and Theresienstadt, were former German concentration camps kept in operation for years after the war. As Sir John Colville, formerly Winston Churchill's private secretary, told his colleagues in the British Foreign Office in 1946, it was clear that "concentration camps and all they stand for did not come to an end with the defeat of Germany." Ironically, no more than 100 or so miles away from the camps being put to this new use, the surviving Nazi leaders were being tried by the Allies in the courtroom at Nuremberg on a bill of indictment that listed "deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population" under the heading of "crimes against humanity."
By any measure, the postwar expulsions were a manmade disaster and one of the most significant examples of the mass violation of human rights in recent history. Yet although they occurred within living memory, in time of peace, and in the middle of the world's most densely populated continent, they remain all but unknown outside Germany itself. On the rare occasions that they rate more than a footnote in European-history textbooks, they are commonly depicted as justified retribution for Nazi Germany's wartime atrocities or a painful but necessary expedient to ensure the future peace of Europe. As the historian Richard J. Evans asserted in In Hitler's Shadow (1989) the decision to purge the continent of its German-speaking minorities remains "defensible" in light of the Holocaust and has shown itself to be a successful experiment in "defusing ethnic antagonisms through the mass transfer of populations."
Even at the time, not everyone agreed. George Orwell, an outspoken opponent of the expulsions, pointed out in his essay "Politics and the English Language" that the expression "transfer of population" was one of a number of euphemisms whose purpose was "largely the defense of the indefensible." The philosopher Bertrand Russell acidly inquired: "Are mass deportations crimes when committed by our enemies during war and justifiable measures of social adjustment when carried out by our allies in time of peace?" A still more uncomfortable observation was made by the left-wing publisher Victor Gollancz, who reasoned that "if every German was indeed responsible for what happened at Belsen, then we, as members of a democratic country and not a fascist one with no free press or parliament, were responsible individually as well as collectively" for what was being done to noncombatants in the Allies' name.
That the expulsions would inevitably cause death and hardship on a very large scale had been fully recognized by those who set them in motion. To a considerable extent, they were counting on it. For the expelling countries—especially Czechoslovakia and Poland—the use of terror against their German-speaking populations was intended not simply as revenge for their wartime victimization, but also as a means of triggering a mass stampede across the borders and finally achieving their governments' prewar ambition to create ethnically homogeneous nation-states. (Before 1939, less than two-thirds of Poland's population, and only a slightly larger proportion of Czechoslovakia's, consisted of gentile Poles, Czechs, or Slovaks.)
For the Soviets, who had "compensated" Poland for its territorial losses to the Soviet Union in 1939 by moving its western border more than 100 miles inside German territory, the clearance of the newly "Polish" western lands and the dumping of their millions of displaced inhabitants amid the ruins of the former Reich served Stalin's twin goals of impeding Germany's postwar recovery and eliminating any possibility of a future Polish-German rapprochement. The British viewed the widespread suffering that would inevitably attend the expulsions as a salutary form of re-education of the German population. "Everything that brings home to the Germans the completeness and irrevocability of their defeat," Deputy Prime Minister Clement Richard Attlee wrote in 1943, "is worthwhile in the end." And the Americans, as Laurence Steinhardt, ambassador to Prague, recorded, hoped that by displaying an "understanding" and cooperative attitude toward the expelling countries' desire to be rid of their German populations, the United States could demonstrate its sympathy for those countries' national aspirations and prevent them from drifting into the Communist orbit.
The Allies, then, knowingly embarked on a course that, as the British government was warned in 1944 by its own panel of experts, was "bound to cause immense suffering and dislocation." That the expulsions did not lead to the worst consequences that could be expected from the chaotic cattle drive of millions of impoverished, embittered, and rootless deportees into a war-devastated country that had nowhere to put them was due to three main factors.
The first was the skill with which the postwar German chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, drew the expellees into mainstream politics, defusing the threat of a potentially radical and disruptive bloc. The second was the readiness of most expellees—the occasionally crass or undiplomatic statements of their leaders notwithstanding—to renounce the use or threat of force as a means of redressing their grievances. The third, and by far the most important, was the 30-year-long "economic miracle" that made possible the housing, feeding, and employment of the largest homeless population with which any industrial country has ever had to contend. (In East Germany, on the other hand, the fact that the standard of living for the indigenous population was already so low meant that the economic gap between it and the four million arriving expellees was more easily bridged.)
The downside of "economic miracles," though, is that, as their name suggests, they can't be relied upon to come along where and when they are most needed. By extraordinary good fortune, the Allies avoided reaping the harvest of their own recklessness. Nonetheless, the expulsions have cast a long and baleful shadow over central and southeastern Europe, even to the present day. Their disruptive demographic, economic, and even—as Eagle Glassheim has pointed out—environmental consequences continue to be felt more than 60 years later. The overnight transformation of some of the most heterogeneous regions of the European continent into virtual ethnic monoliths changed the trajectory of domestic politics in the expelling countries in significant and unpredicted ways. Culturally, the effort to eradicate every trace of hundreds of years of German presence and to write it out of national and local histories produced among the new Polish and Czech settler communities in the cleared areas what Gregor Thum has described as a state of "amputated memory." As Thum shows in his groundbreaking study of postwar Wroclaw—until 1945 and the removal of its entire population, the German city of Breslau—the challenge of confronting their hometown's difficult past is one that post-Communist Wroclawites have only recently taken up. In most other parts of Central Europe, it has hardly even begun.
Still less so in the English-speaking world. It is important to note that the expulsions are in no way to be compared to the genocidal Nazi campaign that preceded them. But neither can the supreme atrocity of our time become a yardstick by which gross abuses of human rights are allowed to go unrecognized for what they are. Contradicting Allied rhetoric that asserted that World War II had been fought above all to uphold the dignity and worth of all people, the Germans included, thousands of Western officials, servicemen, and technocrats took a full part in carrying out a program that, when perpetrated by their wartime enemies, they did not hesitate to denounce as contrary to all principles of humanity.
The degree of cognitive dissonance to which this led was exemplified by the career of Colonel John Fye, chief U.S. liaison officer for expulsion affairs to the Czechoslovak government. The operation he had helped carry out, he acknowledged, drew in "innocent people who had never raised so much as a word of protest against the Czechoslovak people." To accomplish it, women and children had been thrown into detention facilities, "many of which were little better than the ex-German concentration camps." Yet these stirrings of unease did not prevent Fye from accepting a decoration from the Prague government for what the official citation candidly described as his valuable services "in expelling Germans from Czechoslovakia."
Today we have come not much further than Fye did in acknowledging the pivotal role played by the Allies in conceiving and executing an operation that exceeded in both scale and lethality the violent breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. It is unnecessary to attribute this to any "taboo" or "conspiracy of silence." Rather, what is denied is not the fact of the expulsions themselves, but their significance.
Many European commentators have maintained that to draw attention to them runs the risk of diminishing the horror that ought properly to be reserved for the Holocaust and other Nazi atrocities, or giving rise to a self-pitying "victim" mentality among today's generation of Germans, for whom the war is an increasingly distant memory. Czechs, Poles, and citizens of other expelling states fear the legal ramifications of a re-examination of the means by which millions of erstwhile citizens of those countries were deprived of their nationality, liberty, and property. To this day, the postwar decrees expropriating and denationalizing Germans remain on the statute book of the Czech Republic, and their legality has recently been reaffirmed by the Czech constitutional court.
Some notable exceptions aside, like T. David Curp, Matthew Frank, and David Gerlach, English-speaking historians—out of either understandable sympathy for Germany's victims or reluctance to complicate the narrative of what is still justifiably considered a "good war"—have also not been overeager to delve into the history of a messy, complex, morally ambiguous, and politically sensitive episode, in which few if any of those involved appear in a creditable light.
By no means are all of these concerns unworthy ones. But neither are they valid reasons for failing to engage seriously with an episode of such obvious importance, and to integrate it within the broader narrative of modern European history. For historians to write—and, still worse, to teach—as though the expulsions had never taken place or, having occurred, are of no particular significance to the societies affected by them, is both intellectually and pedagogically unsustainable.
The fact that population transfers are currently making a comeback on the scholarly and policy agenda also suggests that we should scrutinize with particular care the most extensive experiment made with them to date. Despite the gruesome history, enthusiasts continue to chase the mirage of "humane" mass deportations as a means of resolving intractable ethnic problems. Andrew Bell-Fialkoff, in a much-cited study, has advocated population transfers as a valuable tool so long as they are "conducted in a humane, well-organized manner, like the transfer of Germans from Czechoslovakia by the Allies in 1945-47." John Mearsheimer, Chaim Kaufmann, Michael Mann and others have done likewise.
Few wars today, whether within or between states, do not feature an attempt by one or both sides to create facts on the ground by forcibly displacing minority populations perceived as alien to the national community. And although the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court has attempted to restrain this tendency by prohibiting mass deportations, Elazar Barkan maintains that such proscriptions are far from absolute, and that "today there is no single code of international law that explicitly outlaws population transfers either in terms of group or individual rights protections."
The expulsion of the ethnic Germans is thus of contemporary as well as historical relevance. At present, though, the study of many vital elements of this topic is still in its earliest stages. Innumerable questions—about the archipelago of camps and detention centers, the precise number and location of which are still undetermined; the sexual victimization of female expellees, which was on a scale to rival the mass rapes perpetrated by Red Army soldiers in occupied Germany; the full part played by the Soviet and U.S. governments in planning and executing the expulsions—remain to be fully answered. At a moment when the surviving expellees are passing away and many, though far from all, of the relevant archives have been opened, the time has come for this painful but pivotal chapter in Europe's recent history to receive at last the scholarly attention it deserves.
R.M. Douglas is an associate professor of history at Colgate University. This essay is adapted from his new book, published by Yale University Press, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans After the Second World War.


De opmerking van Cees van Veelen onder dit artikel verdient een wat prominentere plaats dus ik copieer hem ook maar hier:

"Tegen de achtergrond van onder andere deze gigantische migratiestroom is in 1951 het vluchtelingenverdrag tot stand gekomen. Maar ook dat is vergeten. Toenmalig staatssecretaris Albayrak heb ik horen zeggen dat het vluchtelingenverdrag uitging van enkelingen, en niet opgewassen was tegen de 'grote groepen' aan het eind van vorige eeuw.."

Law Blogs
Law blog Klik op +1 als u dit een interessant artikel vindt en Google zal het dan beter zichtbaar maken in de zoekresultaten.


Tegen de achtergrond van onder andere deze gigantische migratiestroom is in 1951 het vluchtelingenverdrag tot stand gekomen. Maar ook dat is vergeten. Toenmalig staatssecretaris Albayrak heb ik horen zeggen dat het vluchtelingenverdrag uitging van enkelingen, en niet opgewassen was tegen de 'grote groepen' aan het eind van vorige eeuw...


Recente berichten

en meer

Populaire posts van de afgelopen 30 dagen

Hier staan de IND werkinstructies

De openbare. Er zijn er ook nog die niet gepubliceerd zijn. Een overzicht van de werkinstructies vindt u hieronder. Deze instructies zijn nadrukkelijk géén beleidsregels, maar procedurele instructies en zijn dan ook niet bedoeld als vervanging van de bepalingen in de Vreemdelingencirculaire 2000. Er kunnen overigens goede redenen bestaan om in een individueel geval maatwerk te leveren en van een instructie af te wijken. WI 2021/16 Mensenhandel in asielzaken WI 2021/15 Richtlijnen arbeidsmarktaantekeningen WI 2021/14 Spoor 2 WI 2021/13 Nader gehoor WI 2021/12 Medische problematiek en horen en beslissen in de asielprocedure WI 2021/10 Grensprocedure WI 2021/9 Bijzondere procedurele waarborgen WI 2021/8 Aanmeldgehoren WI 2021/5 Rol contactpersonen mensenhandel en gendergerelateerde zaken regulier WI 2021/4 Nader onderzoek in de nareisprocedure inclusief DNA-onderzoek in de asielprocedure WI 2021/3 BMA advies tijdens de Dublinprocedure n.a.v. arrest C.K. WI 2020/19 Palestijnen WI

Wat als je vergeten bent je verblijfsvergunning te verlengen?

(De tekst is geupdate op 7 oktober 2020)   Iemand stuurde deze week in paniek een mailtje want ze was er achter gekomen dat haar verblijfsvergunning was verlopen. Wat dan te doen? Wat te doen als u uw verblijfsvergunning bent vergeten te verlengen? 1) Controleer eerst wat voor vergunning u heeft. Is het een vergunning voor onbepaalde tijd? Dan is uw vergunning niet verlopen maar alleen het pasje. Neem dan contact op met de IND en vraag een nieuw pasje aan. Op de site van de IND staat daarvoor een formulier 2) Heeft u een vergunning voor bepaalde tijd? Ja die moet op tijd worden verlengd want anders verloopt hij. DIEN DE AANVRAAG ALTIJD SCHRIFTELIJK IN EN BEWAAR EEN KOPIE MET BEWIJS VAN VERZENDING . 2a) Is hij korter dan twee jaar verlopen dien dan zo snel mogelijk een aanvraag voor verlenging in met het formulier op de IND site dat bij uw situatie past. Was er een goede reden waarom u te

Oude (groot)ouder naar Nederland willen halen kan soms

 DIT BELEID IS AFGESCHAFT. Tegenwoordig probeer ik het voor klanten op basis van artikel 8 EVRM of op basis van Richtlijn 2004/28 (in de volksmond de België-route genoemd). Neem gerust eens contact op Op  werd mij gisteren een vraag gesteld door een mevrouw wiens oma hulpbehoevend was geworden en wiens enige kind in Nederland woonde en zelf nog werkte en dus niet goed kon zorgen voor haar ouder zo ver weg. Kan je dan die ouder of grootouder naar Nederland laten komen? In sommige gevallen kan dat. Hiervoor moet een mvv bij de Nederlandse ambassade in dat land worden aangevraagd en dan kan bij verlening het oudje naar Nederland reizen en hier een verblijfsvergunning aanvragen. De voorwaarden zijn aldus: De verblijfsvergunning regulier voor bepaalde tijd in het kader van verruimde gezinshereniging kan op aanvraag worden verleend aan vreemdelingen van 65 jaar of ouder die in Nederland willen verblijven bij hun kind(eren). Artikel 3

Stichting LOS schreef boek "Post Deportation Risk" over de mensenrechten situatie na terugkeer

Post Deportation Risks Wat is de mensenrechten-situatie van terugkeerders na deportatie? In dit rapport is de beschikbare kennis hierover gebundeld, voor bijna 30 belangrijke herkomst-landen. Wellicht is mijn boekenblog ook interessant: Interessant artikel? Deel het eens met uw netwerk en help mee met het verspreiden van de bekendheid van dit blog. Er staan wellicht nog meer artikelen op dit weblog die u zullen boeien. Kijk gerust eens rond. Zelf graag wat willen plaatsen? Mail dan In verband met geldwolven die denken geld te kunnen claimen op krantenartikelen die op een blog als deze worden geplaatst maar na meestal een dag voor de krantenlezers aan leeswaardigheid hebben ingeboet terwijl wij vreemdelingenrecht specialisten ze soms wel nog jaren gebruiken om er een kopie van te maken vo

Waarom was het Afghaanse personeel van de Nederlandse missie zo onwelkom in een Refo boerendorp op de Veluwe?

Heeft u zich ook zo verbaasd hoe in een dorp op de Veluwe de Nederlandse tolken en bewakers van Nederlandse soldaten en ambassadepersoneel onwelkom waren? Ze boerenkinkels noemen is een belediging voor mijn boeren buren. Als kerkgangers gooien ze juist met stenen net als de Taliban. Hoe kan een gemeenschap waar op zondag naastenliefde wordt gepredikt en waar nabuurschap wellicht ook in de dorpscultuur is zich zo gedragen? Na het lezen van het artikel in het RD kan ik alleen maar onwetendheid, domheid en een slapend B&W concluderen. Een vrouw met een hoofddoek in de supermarkt kan niet? Loopt hun moeder, zus, vrouw niet met een hoedje naar de kerk op zondag en mag er geen broek aan? Is vrijheid van godsdienst niet wederkerig? Juist van zulke mensen zou je verwachten dat ze begrip zouden hebben voor geloofsvoorschriften. Ik ga binnenkort in mijn Marokkaanse jurk met hoofddoek maar eens boodschappen doen in de Harskamp. Oh en ik ben Christelijk opgevoed en ben dikke maten met een &quo

Refugee Resettlement and Complementary Pathways: Opportunities for Growth

  Migration Policy Institute  schreef:  The global refugee protection regime is under pressure, with the gap between the number of forcibly displaced persons and the solutions available to address their displacement growing. Yet countries are showing new innovation in the design of resettlement programmes and in facilitating access to complementary pathways to aid people in need of protection, including through work and study visas. A new report from MPI Europe and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency offers a global mapping of refugee resettlement and complementary pathways, with recommendations for how these programmes could potentially be scaled up. Providing examples from Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and the Americas, the report also takes a closer look at five case study countries—Finland, France, Germany, Japan, and the United States.          Lees het artikel hier:

Ga je met mij mee een cursus TURKS doen? Online via de Volksuniversiteit Amsterdam

  Turks Turks is een compleet andere taal dan je gewend bent, maar met onze cursussen leer je de codes te kraken! Heb jij altijd al de Turkse taal willen leren? Meld je dan nu aan voor Turkse les in Amsterdam! Artık biraz Türkçe konuşabiliyor musun ? Spreek je al een beetje Turks? Daag jezelf dan uit met onze vervolgcursussen. Kies de Turkse les die bij je past: offline in één van onze ruime lokalen, of online via Zoom. Merhaba ! Alle online cursussen Turks die in september starten hebben 20% korting. 14 sep Online Cursus Turks Beginners 1 (A0-A1.1) Cursuscode: 2857 Merhaba!  Deze cursus Turks is voor echte beginners. We beginnen bij het Türk abecesi (Turkse alfabet) en oefenen de eerste grammatica Dinsdag 14 september 2021 12 lessen van 1,5 uur aanvangstijd 18:3

LUISTERBOEK: De hemel is altijd paars van Sholeh Rezazadeh

De hemel is altijd paars van Sholeh Rezazadeh is een poëtische debuutroman van een groot literair talent. Arghavan is een jonge Iraanse vrouw die nog maar kort in Nederland woont. Terwijl ze worstelt om een nieuw leven op te bouwen, wordt ze geplaagd door herinneringen aan haar jeugd in Iran. Een jeugd die paradijselijk begon maar een negatieve wending nam toen haar moeder van de ene op de andere dag vertrok en haar vader, haar steun en toeverlaat, verslaafd raakte aan opium. Ze nam daarop een radicaal besluit: ze liet het rauwe, bergachtige landschap van Iran definitief achter zich en vertrok naar het platste land ter wereld: Nederland. Arghavan werkt in een tweedehandswinkel in Amsterdam, waar ze bevriend raakt met sommige klanten, zoals met Anna, een dove danseres, en de oude Johan, die het geluid van bomen opneemt. Ze verwondert zich over dit land waar iedereen haast heeft en waar het onmogelijk lijkt om met de ander verbonden te zijn. Dan wordt ze verliefd op Mees,

Salarisvereisten en de verblijfsvergunning op basis van de ICT-richtlijn

  In de Preambule bij de Richtlijn wordt onder punt 15 aangegeven dat: "Voor   binnen   een   onderneming   overgeplaatste   personen   moeten   op   zijn   minstens   dezelfde   arbeidsvoorwaarden gelden als voor ter beschikking gestelde werknemers van wie de werkgever is gevestigd op het grondgebied van de Unie, zoals omschreven in Richtlijn 96/71/EG van het Europees Parlement en de Raad (1). De lidstaten moeten eisen dat binnen een onderneming overgeplaatste personen wat betreft de bezoldiging tijdens de gehele overplaat­sing dezelfde behandeling krijgen als de onderdanen die vergelijkbare posities bekleden. Elke lidstaat moet verant­woordelijk zijn voor het controleren van de bezoldiging die de binnen een onderneming overgeplaatste persoon tijdens zijn verblijf op het grondgebied van de lidstaat ontvangt. Dit moet werknemers beschermen en een eerlijkeconcurrentie waarborgen tussen ondernemingen die zijn gevestigd in een lidstaat en die welke zijn gevestigd in een derde l

VACANCY (remote working possible): City Practice Manager migration and displacement

  City Practice Manager New York, New York, United States Temporary Description BACKGROUND The Mayors Migration Council The Mayors Migration Council  (MMC) is a mayor-led advisory and advocacy organization to accelerate global responses on migration and displacement. Our mission is to ensure that policies and investments to tackle pressing challenges — from pandemics to climate change — both reflect and address realities on the ground for the benefit of migrants, displaced persons, and the communities that receive them. To fulfill our vision, we help cities engage in diplomatic activities at the national, regional, and international level so they can effectively influence decisions; unlock technical and financial resources to cities so they can deliver better outcomes on the ground; and help cities implement local solutions efficiently and at scale to accelerate impact locally and globally. We are led by a Leadership Board composed of the mayors of Amman, Bristol, Free