Vreemdelingenrecht.com - het weblog

(For English scroll down) Aanstaande vrijdag organiseert het Instituut voor Immigratierecht van de Universiteit te Leiden, in samenwerking met de SVMA, de conferentie: "Gekommen um zu bleiben: The right to respect for private life and the regularisation of irregular migrants". De Engelstalige conferentie zal in Leiden worden gehouden in een van de universiteitsgebouwen met een keur van internationale experts. De thema’s vanuit Nederlands perspectief worden onder andere belicht door Eva Hilbrink, Martijn Stronks en Agnes Stijn. De bijeenkomst begint om 10.00 uur en zal afgesloten worden met een afternoon (high) tea omstreeks 15.30 uur. We verwachten een zonnige en inspirerende dag op een sfeervolle locatie. En na afloop is er voldoende tijd om uit te blazen in de nabijgelegen mooiste tuin< https://www.hortusleiden.nl/ > van Nederland en het prachtige Leiden verder te verkennen. U kunt zich hier http://www.leidenlawconference.nl/thuis/57-gekommen-um-zu-...

Voor hen die bezig zijn met zaken rond langdurig verblijvende kinderen wat inspiratie uit Engeland. Bedenk echter wel dat in Engeland 8 EVRM is vertaald naar Brits nationaal recht en dat minder ruimte lijkt te geven voor een weging van het belang van de staat zoals het EVRM wel kent. Can children and parents apply to remain after seven years residence? From a child’s perspective, seven years of residence in the UK can be literally a lifetime. It may be the sum of all the child’s experience and the UK may be the only home they know in any meaningful sense. On top of that, children do not make their own informed choices about moving homes and countries. To put it another way, whilst a dults make informed choices about where to live , children have to cope with the consequences of other people’s choices. Lees hier verder:  https://www.freemovement.org.uk/can-children-and-parents-apply-to-remain-after-seven-years-residence/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_ca...

‘New’ Article 8 Authorities Are Not Legislation (artikel 8 priveleven lijkt een heel ander leven te lijden dan in NL) Posted on February 10, 2015 by mkp R (Esther Ebun Oludoyi & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Article 8 – MM (Lebanon) and Nagre) IJR [2014] UKUT 539 (IAC) (29 October 2014 ) This decision clarifies that judgments such as Nagre [2013] EWHC 720 , Gulshan [2013] UKUT 640 (see here ) and Shahzad [2014] UKUT 85 must not be construed as qualifying or fettering the evaluation of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Equally, according to the Upper Tribunal, the guidance provided in these authorities must be read in context and must not be construed as if the judgments are pieces of legislation. This decision also tries to correct the axiomatic misunderstanding that under Nagre if a person does not satisfy the requirements for the grant of leave under Appendix FM or paragrap...

Posted with permission from autor. Original article:  http://www.freemovement.org.uk/2012/06/10/can-article-8-be-overridden/  The Free Movement blog is written mainly by barristers in the immigration team at Renaissance Chambers   Can Article 8 be ‘overridden’? By Free Movement On 10 June 2012 · Leave a Comment · In Human rights , News The BBC is today reporting that Theresa May intends on Monday to introduce new guidelines telling judges what to think about Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 8 is the right to a private and family life and is worth quoting in full: 1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic we...