Vreemdelingenrecht.com - het weblog

Pending Case NA (C-115/15): Four Questions For CJEU Involving a myriad of intriguing issues, the EU law tale of a Pakistani lady called Nazia Ahmed (NA) has been reported as [2013] UKUT 89 (IAC) , [2014] EWCA Civ 995 and [2015] EWCA Civ 140 . These days her case is simply known as Pending Case NA (C-115/15) and may hold the key to unlocking numerous doors in EU law. Lees het uitgebreide artikel geschreven door een Brits/Pakistaanse jurist hier:  https://asadakhan.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/pending-case-na-c-11515-four-questions-for-cjeu/ De gestelde vragen zijn: In this judgment, the Court of Appeal referred the following question to the CJEU: Must a third country national ex-spouse of an EU citizen be able to show that their former spouse was exercising treaty rights in the host member state at the time of their divorce in order to retain a right of residence under article 13(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC?  (....)   In light of the above issues, Lord...

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015 — Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten v N (Case C-150/15) Language of the case: German Referring court Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Der Bundesbeauftragte für Asylangelegenheiten Defendant: N Other party: Federal Republic of Germany Questions referred 1. Is Article 9(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 10(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU  1 to be interpreted as follows: a)    that a severe violation of the freedom of religion guaranteed by Article 10(1) CFREU (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) and Article 9(1) ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) and thus an act of persecution under Article 9(1)(a) of the Directive must be assumed when religious acts or expressions of view that are mandated by a doctrine o...