Uitspraak EHRM in zaak van Ethiopische afgewezen asielzoeker v Zweden
Deel uitspraak: 2. T he Cour t ’ s assessment 33 . The Court finds that the issues under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention are indissociable and it will therefore examine them together. 34 . The Court reiterates that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their treaty obligations, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see, for example, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII; Abdulaziz, Caba les and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, § 67; and Boujlifa v. France , judgment of 21 October 1997, Reports 1997 ‑ VI, p. 2264, § 42). However, the expulsion of an alien by a Contracting State may give rise to an issue under Article 3, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have ...